|
Presentation
notes on the Budget transparency scorecard for five Latin American countries: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, and Peru · The origin of this effort: Second Conference held in Cape Town, South Africa. · Crucial decision: it is a group effort, work team, all the stages of the project would be reached together · The proposal was made by the Mexican organizations and the comments of all the participants (CIDE, Fundar, Equidad y Género) General Objectives
Participants · Team work throughout the process · One coordinator, one assistant Previous Work · Review of other efforts, very useful (IDASA, IMF-Transparency, Transparency International) · Although we will do something different that emphasizes the social perception of transparency. This is what distinguishes this effort, the incorporation of the social side of the coin: How is transparency perceived by key social actors? Project Development Five stages:
Work
Description First international meeting, to discuss the guides. The three guides, to polish the methodology. First guide: Where and how can transparency be measured. The study of the institutional framework of budget transparency, the formal rules of the game: legal framework, formal role of key actors, analysis of the resources of these actors, etc. Elements taken into account: Decision making process; Budget legal frameworks; Clarity of roles and functions; Accessibility of information to public; Supervision and independent analysis. Second guide: This index integrates the social side of the coin: Not only the formal transparency but it’s social usefulness. That is, the extend to which transparency is available, profitable for social actors in order to allow participation, social controls, better resource allocation, less corruption, better accountability. This study will, therefore, reveal the degrees of accessibility of transparency, the access to information, and social capacity to assimilate it. We will proceed thought: 35 interviews, 60 multiple choice questions, at least nine sectors considered: executive, legislative, sub national government, internal audit, external audit, entrepreneurial, industrial, banking, civil associations, NGO’s unions, mass media, academics. Third guide: Present the information and construct the national budget transparency scorecard, that will make a fusion of the two previous findings. And general ideas on international comparison. Work Description
Expected Products:
|