Home About the IBP Groups Resources Conference Search FAQ Sitemap
 
The International Budget Project
conferences>
Fourth Conference
of the International Budget Project

The fourth IBP conference took place in Mexico, City from March 9-13, 2003.  It was attended by 140 participants from 40 countries to share the diverse experiences, accomplishments, and challenges of applied budget work by civil society around the world.

Plenaries:
State of Budget Work
Budget Advocacy
Pro-Poor Budgeting
Improving Expenditure Quality
International Financial Institutions and Budgeting
The IFI's and Civil Society


Workshops:
Advocacy Workshops
How to Workshops (1)

How to Workshops (2)
Open Dialogue Spaces


Organizations Directory
Participants Directory
Photo Gallery

Sunday, March 9, 2003

pyramids.jpg (92102 bytes)

  • 17:00 – 18:30
    IBP Orientation for Newcomers
    Isaac Shapiro
    Jim St. George
  • 19:30 - Opening
    Sergio Aguayo – FUNDAR, Mexico
    Carlos Elizondo – CIDE, Mexico
    Kim Keith-Brown – Ford Foundation, Mexico

Tour of Teotihuacán Pyramids

          Monday, March 10, 2003

09:00 – 10:45
Plenary:   State of Budget Work
arrow.gif (845 bytes)
Chair:  Warren Krafchik, IBP
This session consists of five presentations on the growth of civil society budget work in five regions around the world.  Each regional presentation highlights the major trends in applied budget work, the countries involved, types of work, major new opportunities and initiatives, and obstacles to further growth in budget work.  IBP input follows the regional reports, drawing together some trends across the world.  Read the Introduction here.

10:45 – 11:15         Break

11:15 – 13:15
Plenary: Budget Advocacy
arrow.gif (845 bytes) What Have We Learnt?  
Chair:  Ellen Nissenbaum, IBP
There is a wealth of practical budget advocacy experience among participants at the conference.  The aim of this session is to start a dialogue on what groups have been learning about budget advocacy – what works and does not work across different regions, systems and issues?  The plenary session will consist of inputs from experienced budget groups representing advocacy lessons from different types of organizations.

13:15 – 14:45         Lunch

14:45 – 16:30
Discussion Groups: Budget arrow.gif (845 bytes)  Advocacy – Sharing Regional Experiences
Participants will gather in five regional workshops to share advocacy stories of what has worked and not worked and report back to plenary on specific questions.


16:30 – 17:00        Break

wpe200.jpg (18936 bytes)

17:00 – 18:30
Plenary: Discussion Groups arrow.gif (845 bytes) Reports and Synthesis
Each workshop will report back to plenary according to common questions above.  David Cohen from the Advocacy Institute in the U.S. is designated as an overall reporter to synthesize the material emerging from the regional discussion groups.

19:30 -         Dinner at the hotel


Tuesday, 11 March, 2003

09:00 – 10:45             Advocacy Workshops

  • Budgets and Public Advocacy – Developing a Campaign Strategy.  Jim Shultz, Democracy Center, Bolivia
  • Working with the Media. Michelle Bazie, CBPP, U.S. and David Cohen, Advocacy Institute, U.S.
  • Linking Economic Literacy to Budget Advocacy. John Samuel, NCBS, India and Fundemos, Nicaragua
  • Working with Legislatures and Parliaments.  Ellen Nissenbaum, IBP and Jorge Romero, Fundar, Mexico
  • Budget Information Advocacy in Transitional Democracies – Case Studies of Indonesia and Russia.  FITRA, Indonesia and Tatiana Vinogradova, Strategy, Russia

10:45 – 11:15         Break

11:15 – 13:15
Plenary: Pro-Poor Budgeting – What Have We learned? arrow.gif (845 bytes)
wpe233.jpg (22406 bytes)
Chair:  Christine Wong
Pro-poor budgeting is widely supported but there is little clarity in the literature on exactly what it means.  Yet, budget groups around the world have substantial practical experience in trying to find methods to prioritize resource allocations to the poor.  This session is designed to help participants to take stock of major research efforts, synthesize their experiences and begin to build a common framework and lessons for pro-poor budgeting.

13:15 – 14:45         Lunch

14:45 – 16:30             How to Workshops (1)

  • How to link Budgets and ESC Rights? Ann Blyberg, International Human Rights Internship Project, U.S. and Gabriel Lara, Fundar, Mexico
  • Brazilian Experiences of Budget Participation in Local Government?   Joao Sucupira, Brazilian Institute for Social and Economic Analysis (Ibase), Brazil and Gabriel Isasa, Center for Advice and Urban Studies (Cidade), Brazil
  • Monitoring Reproductive Health in Mexico.  Lucía Pérez-Fragoso and Concepción Martínez, Equidad de Género, Mexico
  • Methods to Monitor and Evaluate Budgets.  Alta Fölscher, Consultant, South Africa
  • Monitoring Housing and Pro-Poor Budgeting in Indonesia. Dedi Haryadi, BIGS, Indonesia
  • How to Measure Transparency and Participation in the Budget Process.  Eduardo Morón, Universidad del Pacífico, Peru and Soji Apampa, Integrity, Nigeria

16:30 – 17:00          Break
pro-poorpanel.jpg (816435 bytes)

17:00 – 18:30          Open Dialogue Space

Dinner in Downtown Mexico City
wpe4.jpg (26206 bytes)


Wednesday, 12 March, 2003

09:00  - 11:00
Plenary: Improving Expenditure Quality arrow.gif (845 bytes)
wpe1.jpg (36943 bytes)

Chair: Marritt Claassens
Budget groups generally focus on evaluating the amount of money spent in the budget.  Several groups around the world, many of them in low-income countries, have begun to focus on methods to evaluate how well public monies are spent. This session will focus on recent, pioneering efforts in this regard.

11:00 – 11:30            Break
Indiadel.jpg (271072 bytes)

11:30 – 13:30            How to - Workshops (2)

  • Participatory Performance Monitoring.  Zie Gariyo, Uganda Debt Network
  • Citizen Report Cards. Sita Sekhar, Public Affairs Centre, India
  • Measuring Program Impact.  Shaamela Cassiem, Idasa Child Budget Unit, South Africa
  • Monitoring Tax Incidence and Tax Expenditures.   CIDE, Mexico and Joel Friedman, IBP
  • Monitoring Planned and Actual Expenditures.  Robin Sherbourne, IPPR, Namibia
  • Monitoring Expenditures at the City Level.   Leonardo Mello, Ibase, Brazil

13:30 – 15:00             Lunch

15:00 – 16:00
Plenary: International Financial Institutions and Budgeting arrow.gif (845 bytes)
Chair: Michael Lipsky, Ford Foundation  
The Role of the World Bank and IMF and their Impact on Developing Country Budgets.
16:00 – 17:00            
The IFI's and Civil Society
arrow.gif (845 bytes)
Chair: Jim St George, IBP

17:00 – 17:30         Break

17:30 – 19:00            Open Dialogue Space

19:00 -               Dinner at the Hotel

OSI Revenue Watch working dinner:  The Open Society Institute is interested in exploring a Revenue Watch project to enable civil society in natural resource-rich countries to monitor their governments' management of resource-based revenues.  This working dinner will assemble NGO's from countries that earn a substantial portion of their budget revenues from the export of natural resources.   The discussion will focus on exploring interest, opportunity, and risk for development of a Revenue Watch project in these countries, assess what is already being done, discuss opportunities for cross-country collaboration, and means of combining Revenue Watch activity with International Budget Project's budget work in these countries.


Thursday, 13 March, 2003

09:00 – 11:00
Plenary – Cross-Country Initiatives
arrow.gif (845 bytes)
joel.jpg (239037 bytes)
Chair: Isaac Shapiro, IBP
This penultimate session provides information on several major cross-country initiatives and campaigns that are currently under-way. 

The drafting of the Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) has been completed in several African countries, while many others are nearing the completion of this process. Understandably, much attention has been given to issues relating to the process of drafting PRSPs. This is important, as some have expressed concerns that this process was not truly and optimally participative in a number of countries. At the same time, the practical value of these documents will be determined by the effective implementation of the commitments reflected in them.

Almost certainly the most crucial variable that will determine this effectiveness in implementation is the extent to which PRSP commitments filter into resource allocation decisions. Taking meaningful steps towards poverty reduction not only requires policy and rhetoric. It also is essential that scarce public resources be spent in accordance with this goal. In other words, a tight fit between the PRSP and the budget is necessary to effectively implement the strategy.

Recent research on monitoring PRSP implementation shows that much effort has thus far been invested in discussing how to assess the ultimate poverty impact of the strategies. Intermediate output and input monitoring in particular have received far less attention (Booth and Lucas 2002). This despite the fact that the ultimate impact of PRSPs will only be determinable in several years, whereas the more immediate challenge is to monitor that the required inputs are channeled in such a way that is congruent with PRSP commitments. In this context, budget input monitoring assumes a crucial role. Civil society organizations are called upon to hold governments to account for spending decisions in order to monitor progress in implementing policies aimed at reducing and ultimately eradication poverty. This raises several key questions that need to be answered, such as:

- What exactly does the PRSP say about the budget?
- How is this reflected in budgets that follow the finalization of the PRSP?
-
Furthermore, what is required in order for civil society organizations to be able to effectively monitor the congruence between PRSPs and budgets?

The aim of the proposed research is to explore the utility of PRSPs as budget input monitoring tools for civil society organizations. Since in many countries in Africa the implementation of PRSPs is commencing at this time, this is a necessary and timely contribution to the overall debate over the PRSP approach, and the monitoring of its implementation, where different countries and organizations can benefit from the exchange of their respective experiences.

T
he study is a joint initiative between: the Africa Budget Project at IDASA, the Overseas Development Institute (ODI), the Integrated Social Development Centre (Isodec) in Ghana, the Malawi Economic Justice Network in Malawi and Action Aid in Tanzania.


Open Dialogue Spaces arrow.gif (845 bytes) These are 1.5 hour sessions where participants can convene or suggest small group discussions.
  • Defense Budgeting.  Jaime Garreta, CEDAL, Argentina
  • Newsletters and Websites as Dissemination Tools.  Rocío Campos, IBP
  • Rights and Budgets: To What Extent can they be Integrated? Ann Blyberg, Human Rights Internship Program, U.S. and Fundar, Mexico
  • The Challenges of building in-Country Networks of Budget Groups. Nick Johnson, State Fiscal Analysis Project, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, U.S.
  • How to Strengthen Communication between Groups and Researchers Working on Gender Budgets? Lucía Pérez-Fragoso, Equidad de Género, Mexico

Language Options:  Spanish | French | German | Italian | Portuguese |
(Automated translations provided by AltaVista)


Home | About the IBP | Groups | Resources | Themes | Conferences
Search | FAQ | Sitemap

Viewing this site as text-only