Next Country »
« Back to Country List

Georgia

Open Budget Survey 2017

Downloads:
Country Summary Questionnaire
Transparency

82

out of 100
Read More

Public Participation

22

out of 100
Read More

Budget Oversight

74

out of 100
Read More

IBP considers countries that score above 60 on the Open Budget Index as providing sufficient budget information to enable the public to engage in budget discussions in an informed manner. IBP considers countries scoring above 60 on participation and oversight as providing adequate opportunities for the public to participate in the budget process and providing adequate oversight practices, respectively.

Transparency (Open Budget Index)

82

out of 100

Georgia provides the public with extensive budget information.

How Has the Open Budget Index Score Changed Over Time?
Recommendations for Improving Transparency

Georgia should prioritize the following actions to improve budget transparency:

  • Provide detailed data on the financial position of the government, and provide more information on extra-budgetary funds in the Executive’s Budget Proposal.
  • Provide more information on the comparisons between the original macroeconomic forecast and the actual outcome in the Year-End Report.

Public Participation

22

out of 100

Georgia provides few opportunities for the public to engage in the budget process.

How Does Public Participation Compare to Other Countries in the Region?

Global Average 12/100
Kyrgyz Republic 31/100
Georgia 22/100
Kazakhstan 13/100
Russia 13/100
Azerbaijan 11/100
Mongolia 7/100
Tajikistan 7/100
Turkey 0/100
Recommendations for Improving Participation

Georgia should prioritize the following actions to improve public participation in its budget process:

  • Pilot mechanisms for members of the public and executive branch officials to exchange views on national budget matters during both the formulation of the national budget and the monitoring of its implementation. These mechanisms could build on innovations, such as participatory budgeting and social audits. For examples of such mechanisms, see fiscaltransparency.net/mechanisms.
  • Hold legislative hearings on the formulation of the annual budget, during which any member of the public or civil society organizations can testify.

Budget Oversight (by Legislature & Audit)

74

out of 100

The legislature and supreme audit institution in Georgia provide adequate oversight of the budget.

To What Extent Does the Legislature Provide Budget Oversight?

Formulation/Approval 52/100
Execution/Audit 87/100

The legislature provides adequate oversight during the budget cycle. This score reflects that the legislature provides limited oversight during the planning stage of the budget cycle and adequate oversight during the implementation stage of the budget cycle.

To What Extent Does the Supreme Audit Institution Provide Budget Oversight?

Adequate 89/100

The supreme audit institution provides adequate budget oversight.

Recommendations for Improving Oversight

Georgia should prioritize the following actions to make budget oversight more effective:

  • Ensure a legislative committee examines and publishes a report on the Audit Report online.
  • Ensure audit processes are reviewed by an independent agency.

Learn More

The information on this page presents a partial country summary. For more detailed information, please download:


Open Budget Survey 2015

Downloads:
Country Summary - English Country Summary - Russian Questionnaire

Transparency (Open Budget Index) 66/100 

The Government of Georgia provides the public with substantial budget information.

Public Participation 46/100

The Government of Georgia provides the public with limited opportunities to engage in the budget process.

Budget Oversight

By legislature 73/100

Budget oversight by the legislature in Georgia is adequate.

By auditor 100/100

Budget oversight by the supreme audit institution in Georgia is adequate.

Recommendations

Improving Transparency

Georgia should prioritize the following actions to improve budget transparency:

  • Produce and publish a Mid-Year Review.
  • Increase the comprehensiveness of the Executive’s Budget Proposal by, for example, presenting verifiable (quantitative) output and outcome indicators in the program budget appendix that can help measure deliverables in the subprograms and their impact over the period of four years.
  • Increase the comprehensiveness of the Year-End Report.
Improving Participation

Georgia should prioritize the following actions to improve budget participation:

  • Establish credible and effective mechanisms (i.e., public hearings, surveys, focus groups) for capturing a range of public perspectives on budget matters.
  • Ensure the public is informed of the purpose of public budget engagements and provided with sufficient information to participate effectively.
  • Provide detailed feedback on how public assistance and participation has been used by the supreme audit institution.
Improving Oversight

Georgia should prioritize the following actions to strengthen budget oversight:

  • In both law and practice, ensure the legislature is consulted prior to the spending of contingency funds that were not identified in the Enacted Budget.


Open Budget Survey 2010

Downloads:
Country Summary Country Summary - Russian Questionnaire

Open Budget Survey 2008

Downloads:
Country Summary Country Summary Questionnaire

Georgia’s score on the Open Budget Index shows that the government provides the public with some, albeit incomplete, information on the central government’s budget and financial activities during the course of the budget year. This makes it difficult for citizens to hold government accountable for its management of the public’s money.


Open Budget Survey 2006

Downloads:
Country Summary Country Summary Questionnaire



See more on budget work in Georgia »